administrator Site Admin
Joined: 28 Dec 2005 Posts: 11984
|
Posted: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:40 pm Post subject: Carpe Diem Kook & Methinks (Bertha)- Econ Method |
|
|
PeakTrader:
Bertha, how economic variables interrelate (in mathematical models) and interact (in empirical models) explain my position.
I start from an unbiased position, unlike you, who starts from a rigid ideology, along with false assumptions, and jumps to illogical conclusions.
****
Jon says: Marque2 (or should I say Morganovich2
There’s an anarchist running around this blog pretending to be a libertarian attacking and throwing mud and then shrilling “pig.”
I know he’s not representitive of the “Tea Party,” who seem to be polite and clean people.
---
marque2:
It is awful having multiple personality disorder
---
PeakTrader:
Marque2, yes, it sure seems to keep one person busy
****
Jon, you’re on the right side of the kook.
Just don’t disagree with him too often. He’ll relentlessly attack you and drive you out of this blog.
I’ve seen it happen before.
---
PeakTrader:
Methinks, you failed to understand my site, even after I told you. And, don’t play cute games with me. You posted my site just to attack me with your ignorance. Get a life, and a real job.
****
Methinks, I’d guess your real name is Bertha. And, your nickname is Bertha Butthead, to everyone who dealt with you.
Given you cling to dishonest people on this blog, like Morganvich, you likely have a face that scares most people.
I’m not surprised you showed up again on Holloween. How appropriate and convenient for you.
I’ll be calling you Bertha from now on. Methinks is an oxymoron for you anyway.
****
So, if the shoe fits. Bertha fits her perfectly.
Obviously, Bertha never hit it big, because her understanding of risk and reward is poor, and she couldn’t find a speck of gold at Fort Knox.
She found plenty of fools gold. LOL
****
Bertha, I’ve never tried to get clients on this blog. If you want to continue trying to fool people, that’s your problem.
****
Bertha, they wouldn’t have paid me if they knew how. You’d have to send me a very big check to train you how to do it. I suspect, it would take years, if ever. Of course, I’d have to add a big premium just for the aggravation.
****
I think, one reason why Bertha, the Methinks oxymoron, always feels unfulfilled and angry is she looks like Boris Yeltsin.
---
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/11/bloomberg-financial-conditions-index-closes-at-record-high/#comments
---
PeakTrader:
Walt, I try to omit words without losing meaning, e.g. “produced” instead of “has produced.”
I’ve noticed some people are too wordy. They could say the same thing with less than 10% of the words.
On the other hand, I’ve had grad econ books where one page could be expanded to a large book, when the terms, models, and math are explained (the terms and models aren’t explained at all, you’re expected to know them, while an intermediate step in an equation was just stated, without the extensive math, including mathematical tricks, needed to get to that intermediate step).
---
Walt:
Peak, could you go one step further and use the word “made” instead of the word “produced”? That’s half the number of letters and means the same thing for any case I can think of at the moment. BTW, I am grading essay papers for a manufacturing class today if you can’t tell.
---
PeakTrader:
Walt, perhaps “made” isn’t used in economics, because the antonym seems to be “unmade.”
In economics, produce and consume, and supply and demand are used, e.g. to achieve equilibrium.
****
On a related note, I have to go now, shopping with a woman can be more tiring than working
---
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/10/quotation-of-the-day-on-ethanol-one-of-the-great-political-boondoggles-of-our-time-and-its-dangerous-and-delusional/#comments
--- |
|