PeakTrader.com Forum Index PeakTrader.com
Economics, Portfolio Optimization, and Technical Analysis
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Log inFast Charts

Business Cycles and Asset Bubbles-Tea Party-No V-Recovery

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     PeakTrader.com Forum Index -> Articles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
administrator
Site Admin


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 12651

PostPosted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:39 pm    Post subject: Business Cycles and Asset Bubbles-Tea Party-No V-Recovery Reply with quote

Chart:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_otfwl2zc6Qc/TI7d5ESo74I/AAAAAAAAOY8/O1wb04n2z9Y/s1600/homes.jpg

PeakTrader said...

One theory is there were too few houses before 1995, because of the savings & loan crisis, recession, and slow recovery.

Demand for houses increased during the 1995-00 bubble, because the U.S. reached beyond full employment, real wages rose, and actual output increased beyond potential output.

Speculation took over when housing prices kept rising. People wanted to buy houses before they rose even higher, more people were flipping houses, and there was more investing in mortgage backed securities.

Something similar to Tulipmania emerged after the mild recession in 2001 and before the second bubble burst in 2007. Homeowners and investors made lots of money.

----------

juandos said...

PT says: "One theory is there were too few houses before 1995..."...

Hey PT, who would've said something like that?

Was that a government source or someone from the lending industry?

Thanks...

---------

PeakTrader said...

Juandos, my theory is based on business cycles, which sometimes cause asset bubbles (e.g. Nasdaq, housing, gold, etc.).

----------

PeakTrader said...

The defenders of big government are better defending big government than the defenders of the free market are defending the free market.

That's why we have a Marxist President, a Pelosi House, and a 60 seat Democrat Senate.

Too many Americans have no idea that $2 of private benefits is often given up for $1 of public (or state) benefits. Even intelligent Americans can be ignorant.

There's been too much focus on the benefits of big government and too little focus on the costs. Afterall, you cannot miss what you never had.

The Tea (Taxed Enough Already) Party senses government doesn't serve the people or even serve the country. Government serves government. When the government gains, the people, and the country, lose even more.

--------

PeakTrader said...

The Administration and Congress kept placing roadblocks to economic growth. So, of course, a V-shaped recovery couldn't be achieved. The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection is another example.

Reducing uncertainty will help the economy. Bank credit remains low, because banks are less willing to lend and borrowers are less creditworthy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic     PeakTrader.com Forum Index -> Articles All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by PeakTrader 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002